Skip to demo content
MasteryCueGuided product workflow
Synthetic demo dataNo real student information
Finish in tomorrow’s lessonOpen the teacher’s exact next move

Choose a class and date, confirm the curriculum-map skill, then see Support, Push to Proficiency, Extend, and Verify beside the students.

Ms. Jordan’s workspace · Instructional priorities

Who to Teach

Teacher view

Showing California · Grade 6 · ELA. Each selection loads a different fictional evidence snapshot, regrouping students and refreshing recommendations for the sample target. Standard source

Class contextGrade 6 · 26 students

Open a complete Grade 5 reading example · passages, questions, and exit ticket →

Ready to plan for your own class?

Use your classroom evidence to build groups, choose a teaching move, and keep your progress notes together.

Start my 14-day free trial →14 days free. Optional upgrade: $12.99/month.
CLASS PULSE · SELECTED SKILL

How ready is the class?

Cite evidence to support a text inference

Reteach the key step
How to read this signal

The dial shows the share of assessed learners in Extend (mastered), not an average test score. Red: below 50%; yellow: 50–79%; green: 80% or more. If fewer than 80% of the class have evidence, the class signal stays gray. These display cues suggest a lesson response; teachers review the underlying evidence and decide the next move.

WHO TO FOCUS ON

Push to Proficiency · Near Mastery

10learners
TEACH THIS

Practice the selected target and explain the reasoning behind each answer.

Open group lesson · 15 minutes
YOUR NEXT TEACHING MOVE

Tier 1 · Small-group lesson

Use two questions from today’s lesson: work through one together, then check what each student can do alone.

15 min · 3–6 learners · Low prep
TEACHING ROUTINERank the strongest evidence

Full lesson

MasteryCue · Full lesson

Cite evidence to support a text inference

Teaching date: __________ · Tier 1 · Small-group lesson

Standard / objective: Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Curriculum: Manual lesson · confirm fit with your curriculum map

Before class

Pull two plausible and one strong evidence example from the current text.

Bring these materials

Current text and 2–3 evidence options written on the board.

Lesson at a glance · 15 minutes

  1. Quick diagnostic2 min
  2. Targeted model + guided practice8 min
  3. Independent progress check5 min
1

Quick diagnostic

2 minutes

Teacher move

Ask each learner to attempt the key step in Cite evidence to support a text inference and explain the choice. Identify the shared missed step before teaching; do not assume a misconception from the score alone.

Student task

Give one brief response independently and explain your reasoning.

Check for understanding

Confirm the specific gap this group will practice. If their needs differ, adjust the targeted task.

2

Targeted model + guided practice

8 minutes

Teacher move

Teach the missed step explicitly. Present two or three plausible pieces of evidence from the current text. Ask which one most directly proves the target claim and why the others are weaker. Keep the work anchored to: Cite evidence to support a text inference. Guide one attempt, give immediate feedback, and fade optional prompts while retaining required accommodations.

Student task

Discuss the modeled example with a partner, explain the key step, and compare reasoning before working alone.

Check for understanding

Each learner explains and practices the repaired step; use individual responses during guided practice.

3

Independent progress check

5 minutes

Teacher move

Give a fresh task on the same target without the worked answer or partner help. Collect each response; preserve required accommodations. Record the support and the next check date.

Student task

Rank the evidence from strongest to weakest, defend the top choice, then revise the claim if needed. Complete a parallel case independently. Target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Check for understanding

Give a new claim and two evidence choices. Each learner selects one and writes one sentence explaining why it is stronger. Check the selected target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Optional activities · use one during guided practice

Partner practice · 4 minutes

Run it: 1 minute think/write, 2 minutes alternating explainer and evidence-checker roles, 1 minute revise individually. Use the guided-practice task; save the independent check for later.

Option 1 · Think, pair, share

Each learner answers a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference first. Partners explain their reasoning, compare evidence, and revise their own work.

Option 2 · Coach and switch

One learner solves a fresh task on Cite evidence to support a text inference; the partner asks “What supports that step?” without giving the answer. Switch roles with a parallel task. Finish with an individual check.

Both learners record an answer. Partner help is separate from independent evidence.

Movement · 4 minutes

Run it: Present two responses to the guided-practice question. Learners choose, give one supporting detail, hear a competing explanation, and revise. Offer the same choices at a desk.

Option 1 · Choose and justify

Place two possible answers to a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference in different parts of the room. Learners choose, explain with evidence, and reconsider after discussion.

Option 2 · Gallery comparison

Post two worked examples on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Learners visit each, identify the step that works or needs revision, then return to complete a new task independently.

Offer seated response cards or bring the examples to the learner. Movement speed earns no points.

Gamification · 4 minutes

Run it: Use the modeled task and guided-practice question for practice rounds. Reward accurate reasoning and thoughtful revision. Give feedback after each round; everyone attempts the independent task afterward.

Option 1 · Explain and level up

Use three short tasks on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Earn one private point for an accurate answer and one for its reasoning. Revise after feedback, then try a fresh item alone.

Option 2 · Find and fix

Show two plausible solutions on Cite evidence to support a text inference, including one error. Learners find the error, explain why it matters, and repair it. Work toward a shared class goal, then check each learner independently.

Use paper tallies; no public rankings. Record learning evidence separately from game points.

Evidence of effective instruction

Record observable evidence after teaching: Who participated? What did the independent responses show? Which step will you reteach, extend, or check next?

Participation / access supports: ___________________________________

Independent results / misconception observed: _______________________

Instructional adjustment / next check date: __________________________

1
GET READY

Before class: Pull two plausible and one strong evidence example from the current text.

2
GRAB THESE

Materials: Current text and 2–3 evidence options written on the board.

Alternate teaching activitiesTwo options each for partner practice, movement, and learning games.Show activitiesHide activities

Partner practice · 4 minutes

Run it: 1 minute think/write, 2 minutes alternating explainer and evidence-checker roles, 1 minute revise individually. Use the guided-practice task; save the independent check for later.

Option 1 · Think, pair, share

Each learner answers a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference first. Partners explain their reasoning, compare evidence, and revise their own work.

Option 2 · Coach and switch

One learner solves a fresh task on Cite evidence to support a text inference; the partner asks “What supports that step?” without giving the answer. Switch roles with a parallel task. Finish with an individual check.

Both learners record an answer. Partner help is separate from independent evidence.

Movement · 4 minutes

Run it: Present two responses to the guided-practice question. Learners choose, give one supporting detail, hear a competing explanation, and revise. Offer the same choices at a desk.

Option 1 · Choose and justify

Place two possible answers to a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference in different parts of the room. Learners choose, explain with evidence, and reconsider after discussion.

Option 2 · Gallery comparison

Post two worked examples on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Learners visit each, identify the step that works or needs revision, then return to complete a new task independently.

Offer seated response cards or bring the examples to the learner. Movement speed earns no points.

Gamification · 4 minutes

Run it: Use the modeled task and guided-practice question for practice rounds. Reward accurate reasoning and thoughtful revision. Give feedback after each round; everyone attempts the independent task afterward.

Option 1 · Explain and level up

Use three short tasks on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Earn one private point for an accurate answer and one for its reasoning. Revise after feedback, then try a fresh item alone.

Option 2 · Find and fix

Show two plausible solutions on Cite evidence to support a text inference, including one error. Learners find the error, explain why it matters, and repair it. Work toward a shared class goal, then check each learner independently.

Use paper tallies; no public rankings. Record learning evidence separately from game points.
1
Quick diagnostic · 2 min

Teacher: Ask each learner to attempt the key step in Cite evidence to support a text inference and explain the choice. Identify the shared missed step before teaching; do not assume a misconception from the score alone.

Learners: Give one brief response independently and explain your reasoning.

Look for: Confirm the specific gap this group will practice. If their needs differ, adjust the targeted task.

2
Targeted model + guided practice · 8 min

Teacher: Teach the missed step explicitly. Present two or three plausible pieces of evidence from the current text. Ask which one most directly proves the target claim and why the others are weaker. Keep the work anchored to: Cite evidence to support a text inference. Guide one attempt, give immediate feedback, and fade optional prompts while retaining required accommodations.

Learners: Discuss the modeled example with a partner, explain the key step, and compare reasoning before working alone.

Look for: Each learner explains and practices the repaired step; use individual responses during guided practice.

3
Independent progress check · 5 min

Teacher: Give a fresh task on the same target without the worked answer or partner help. Collect each response; preserve required accommodations. Record the support and the next check date.

Learners: Rank the evidence from strongest to weakest, defend the top choice, then revise the claim if needed. Complete a parallel case independently. Target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Look for: Give a new claim and two evidence choices. Each learner selects one and writes one sentence explaining why it is stronger. Check the selected target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Then: If students choose strong evidence but cannot explain why, target reasoning language; if they choose irrelevant evidence, reteach relevance to the claim. Scaffold fading: Move from teacher-provided options to student-selected evidence.

Evidence sourcesFictional classroom evidence
Why this teaching routine fits

The prerequisite foundation appears close enough to keep instruction centered on the selected target. matches subject and readiness group; matches the selected skill family; matches the instructional purpose; matches prerequisite depth; adds useful contrast to the current instructional mode. Evidence tier C: MasteryCue-designed low-prep routine built from accepted instructional principles. The exact activity has not been independently validated.

DIFFERENTIATE

Support · Foundational

8learners
TEACH THIS

Model the missed step, then fade the scaffold for an independent check.

Open group lesson · 15 minutes
YOUR NEXT TEACHING MOVE

Tier 2 option · Targeted small-group lesson

Teach the part students missed, then let each student try a similar question alone.

15 min · 3–6 learners · Low prep
TEACHING ROUTINEModel the evidence decision

Full lesson

MasteryCue · Full lesson

Cite evidence to support a text inference

Teaching date: __________ · Tier 2 option · Targeted small-group lesson

Standard / objective: Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Curriculum: Manual lesson · confirm fit with your curriculum map

Before class

Select one model item and one parallel item.

Bring these materials

Current text or passage, board or paper, pencil.

Lesson at a glance · 15 minutes

  1. Quick diagnostic2 min
  2. Targeted model + guided practice8 min
  3. Independent progress check5 min
1

Quick diagnostic

2 minutes

Teacher move

Ask each learner to attempt the key step in Cite evidence to support a text inference and explain the choice. Identify the shared missed step before teaching; do not assume a misconception from the score alone.

Student task

Give one brief response independently and explain your reasoning.

Check for understanding

Confirm the specific gap this group will practice. If their needs differ, adjust the targeted task.

2

Targeted model + guided practice

8 minutes

Teacher move

Teach the missed step explicitly. Think aloud through one short current-text example. Name the exact clue, line, word, or relationship that makes the response defensible; then hide the worked answer. Keep the work anchored to: Cite evidence to support a text inference. Guide one attempt, give immediate feedback, and fade optional prompts while retaining required accommodations.

Student task

Discuss the modeled example with a partner, explain the key step, and compare reasoning before working alone.

Check for understanding

Each learner explains and practices the repaired step; use individual responses during guided practice.

3

Independent progress check

5 minutes

Teacher move

Give a fresh task on the same target without the worked answer or partner help. Collect each response; preserve required accommodations. Record the support and the next check date.

Student task

Mark the evidence in a parallel example, state the answer, and explain how the evidence supports it. Rehearse one decision with a scaffold, then remove it for the independent check. Target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Check for understanding

Give one fresh excerpt or item with no model. Require an answer plus the exact text evidence used. Check the selected target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Optional activities · use one during guided practice

Partner practice · 4 minutes

Run it: 1 minute think/write, 2 minutes alternating explainer and evidence-checker roles, 1 minute revise individually. Use the guided-practice task; save the independent check for later.

Option 1 · Think, pair, share

Each learner answers a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference first. Partners explain their reasoning, compare evidence, and revise their own work.

Option 2 · Coach and switch

One learner solves a fresh task on Cite evidence to support a text inference; the partner asks “What supports that step?” without giving the answer. Switch roles with a parallel task. Finish with an individual check.

Both learners record an answer. Partner help is separate from independent evidence.

Movement · 4 minutes

Run it: Present two responses to the guided-practice question. Learners choose, give one supporting detail, hear a competing explanation, and revise. Offer the same choices at a desk.

Option 1 · Choose and justify

Place two possible answers to a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference in different parts of the room. Learners choose, explain with evidence, and reconsider after discussion.

Option 2 · Gallery comparison

Post two worked examples on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Learners visit each, identify the step that works or needs revision, then return to complete a new task independently.

Offer seated response cards or bring the examples to the learner. Movement speed earns no points.

Gamification · 4 minutes

Run it: Use the modeled task and guided-practice question for practice rounds. Reward accurate reasoning and thoughtful revision. Give feedback after each round; everyone attempts the independent task afterward.

Option 1 · Explain and level up

Use three short tasks on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Earn one private point for an accurate answer and one for its reasoning. Revise after feedback, then try a fresh item alone.

Option 2 · Find and fix

Show two plausible solutions on Cite evidence to support a text inference, including one error. Learners find the error, explain why it matters, and repair it. Work toward a shared class goal, then check each learner independently.

Use paper tallies; no public rankings. Record learning evidence separately from game points.

Evidence of effective instruction

Record observable evidence after teaching: Who participated? What did the independent responses show? Which step will you reteach, extend, or check next?

Participation / access supports: ___________________________________

Independent results / misconception observed: _______________________

Instructional adjustment / next check date: __________________________

1
GET READY

Before class: Select one model item and one parallel item.

2
GRAB THESE

Materials: Current text or passage, board or paper, pencil.

Alternate teaching activitiesTwo options each for partner practice, movement, and learning games.Show activitiesHide activities

Partner practice · 4 minutes

Run it: 1 minute think/write, 2 minutes alternating explainer and evidence-checker roles, 1 minute revise individually. Use the guided-practice task; save the independent check for later.

Option 1 · Think, pair, share

Each learner answers a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference first. Partners explain their reasoning, compare evidence, and revise their own work.

Option 2 · Coach and switch

One learner solves a fresh task on Cite evidence to support a text inference; the partner asks “What supports that step?” without giving the answer. Switch roles with a parallel task. Finish with an individual check.

Both learners record an answer. Partner help is separate from independent evidence.

Movement · 4 minutes

Run it: Present two responses to the guided-practice question. Learners choose, give one supporting detail, hear a competing explanation, and revise. Offer the same choices at a desk.

Option 1 · Choose and justify

Place two possible answers to a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference in different parts of the room. Learners choose, explain with evidence, and reconsider after discussion.

Option 2 · Gallery comparison

Post two worked examples on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Learners visit each, identify the step that works or needs revision, then return to complete a new task independently.

Offer seated response cards or bring the examples to the learner. Movement speed earns no points.

Gamification · 4 minutes

Run it: Use the modeled task and guided-practice question for practice rounds. Reward accurate reasoning and thoughtful revision. Give feedback after each round; everyone attempts the independent task afterward.

Option 1 · Explain and level up

Use three short tasks on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Earn one private point for an accurate answer and one for its reasoning. Revise after feedback, then try a fresh item alone.

Option 2 · Find and fix

Show two plausible solutions on Cite evidence to support a text inference, including one error. Learners find the error, explain why it matters, and repair it. Work toward a shared class goal, then check each learner independently.

Use paper tallies; no public rankings. Record learning evidence separately from game points.
1
Quick diagnostic · 2 min

Teacher: Ask each learner to attempt the key step in Cite evidence to support a text inference and explain the choice. Identify the shared missed step before teaching; do not assume a misconception from the score alone.

Learners: Give one brief response independently and explain your reasoning.

Look for: Confirm the specific gap this group will practice. If their needs differ, adjust the targeted task.

2
Targeted model + guided practice · 8 min

Teacher: Teach the missed step explicitly. Think aloud through one short current-text example. Name the exact clue, line, word, or relationship that makes the response defensible; then hide the worked answer. Keep the work anchored to: Cite evidence to support a text inference. Guide one attempt, give immediate feedback, and fade optional prompts while retaining required accommodations.

Learners: Discuss the modeled example with a partner, explain the key step, and compare reasoning before working alone.

Look for: Each learner explains and practices the repaired step; use individual responses during guided practice.

3
Independent progress check · 5 min

Teacher: Give a fresh task on the same target without the worked answer or partner help. Collect each response; preserve required accommodations. Record the support and the next check date.

Learners: Mark the evidence in a parallel example, state the answer, and explain how the evidence supports it. Rehearse one decision with a scaffold, then remove it for the independent check. Target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Look for: Give one fresh excerpt or item with no model. Require an answer plus the exact text evidence used. Check the selected target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Then: If the learner can identify relevant evidence independently, return to grade-level application. If evidence is unrelated or missing, teach that specific selection step next. Scaffold fading: Remove the worked example before the final item.

Suggested progress checks: Use this lesson with 3–6 learners who missed the same step. Start with three 10–15 minute sessions this week and record each independent response. Return to the core task after two successful independent checks; adjust the scaffold if the gap persists and follow your school’s intervention process.

Evidence sourcesFictional classroom evidence
Why this teaching routine fits

Prerequisite depth is not yet strong enough to estimate safely, so the move avoids assuming how far behind the learner is. matches subject and readiness group; matches the selected skill family; matches the instructional purpose; matches prerequisite depth. Evidence tier B: Implements established literacy practices supported in IES What Works Clearinghouse practice guides, including explicit comprehension instruction, text discussion, decoding/word analysis where applicable, and repeated opportunities to make sense of grade-appropriate text. The exact MasteryCue routine is an implementation, not a separately validated program. Source basis: IES WWC: Improving Reading Comprehension K-3 (2010); Improving Adolescent Literacy (2008); Providing Reading Interventions Grades 4-9 (2022); Foundational Skills K-3 (rev. 2019).

EXTEND

Extend · Mastered

7learners
TEACH THIS

Transfer the target to a more demanding example and defend the result.

Open group lesson · 15 minutes
YOUR NEXT TEACHING MOVE

Tier 1 · Challenge

Give students a harder version of today’s task and ask them to explain how they know.

15 min · 3–6 learners · Low prep
TEACHING ROUTINECompare two defensible readings

Full lesson

MasteryCue · Full lesson

Cite evidence to support a text inference

Teaching date: __________ · Tier 1 · Challenge

Standard / objective: Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Curriculum: Manual lesson · confirm fit with your curriculum map

Before class

Write two plausible claims.

Bring these materials

Current text and two claims on the board.

Lesson at a glance · 15 minutes

  1. Quick diagnostic2 min
  2. Targeted model + guided practice8 min
  3. Independent progress check5 min
1

Quick diagnostic

2 minutes

Teacher move

Ask each learner to attempt the key step in Cite evidence to support a text inference and explain the choice. Identify the shared missed step before teaching; do not assume a misconception from the score alone.

Student task

Give one brief response independently and explain your reasoning.

Check for understanding

Confirm the specific gap this group will practice. If their needs differ, adjust the targeted task.

2

Targeted model + guided practice

8 minutes

Teacher move

Teach the missed step explicitly. Offer two plausible interpretations or claims about the current text. Require students to test both against the text instead of voting by preference. Keep the work anchored to: Cite evidence to support a text inference. Guide one attempt, give immediate feedback, and fade optional prompts while retaining required accommodations.

Student task

Discuss the modeled example with a partner, explain the key step, and compare reasoning before working alone.

Check for understanding

Each learner explains and practices the repaired step; use individual responses during guided practice.

3

Independent progress check

5 minutes

Teacher move

Give a fresh task on the same target without the worked answer or partner help. Collect each response; preserve required accommodations. Record the support and the next check date.

Student task

Find one piece of evidence for each interpretation, then decide which claim is better supported and defend the choice. Change one condition and justify how that affects the result. Target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Check for understanding

Give a new pair of claims. Each learner writes a short evidence-based judgment independently. Check the selected target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Optional activities · use one during guided practice

Partner practice · 4 minutes

Run it: 1 minute think/write, 2 minutes alternating explainer and evidence-checker roles, 1 minute revise individually. Use the guided-practice task; save the independent check for later.

Option 1 · Think, pair, share

Each learner answers a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference first. Partners explain their reasoning, compare evidence, and revise their own work.

Option 2 · Coach and switch

One learner solves a fresh task on Cite evidence to support a text inference; the partner asks “What supports that step?” without giving the answer. Switch roles with a parallel task. Finish with an individual check.

Both learners record an answer. Partner help is separate from independent evidence.

Movement · 4 minutes

Run it: Present two responses to the guided-practice question. Learners choose, give one supporting detail, hear a competing explanation, and revise. Offer the same choices at a desk.

Option 1 · Choose and justify

Place two possible answers to a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference in different parts of the room. Learners choose, explain with evidence, and reconsider after discussion.

Option 2 · Gallery comparison

Post two worked examples on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Learners visit each, identify the step that works or needs revision, then return to complete a new task independently.

Offer seated response cards or bring the examples to the learner. Movement speed earns no points.

Gamification · 4 minutes

Run it: Use the modeled task and guided-practice question for practice rounds. Reward accurate reasoning and thoughtful revision. Give feedback after each round; everyone attempts the independent task afterward.

Option 1 · Explain and level up

Use three short tasks on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Earn one private point for an accurate answer and one for its reasoning. Revise after feedback, then try a fresh item alone.

Option 2 · Find and fix

Show two plausible solutions on Cite evidence to support a text inference, including one error. Learners find the error, explain why it matters, and repair it. Work toward a shared class goal, then check each learner independently.

Use paper tallies; no public rankings. Record learning evidence separately from game points.

Evidence of effective instruction

Record observable evidence after teaching: Who participated? What did the independent responses show? Which step will you reteach, extend, or check next?

Participation / access supports: ___________________________________

Independent results / misconception observed: _______________________

Instructional adjustment / next check date: __________________________

1
GET READY

Before class: Write two plausible claims.

2
GRAB THESE

Materials: Current text and two claims on the board.

Alternate teaching activitiesTwo options each for partner practice, movement, and learning games.Show activitiesHide activities

Partner practice · 4 minutes

Run it: 1 minute think/write, 2 minutes alternating explainer and evidence-checker roles, 1 minute revise individually. Use the guided-practice task; save the independent check for later.

Option 1 · Think, pair, share

Each learner answers a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference first. Partners explain their reasoning, compare evidence, and revise their own work.

Option 2 · Coach and switch

One learner solves a fresh task on Cite evidence to support a text inference; the partner asks “What supports that step?” without giving the answer. Switch roles with a parallel task. Finish with an individual check.

Both learners record an answer. Partner help is separate from independent evidence.

Movement · 4 minutes

Run it: Present two responses to the guided-practice question. Learners choose, give one supporting detail, hear a competing explanation, and revise. Offer the same choices at a desk.

Option 1 · Choose and justify

Place two possible answers to a task on Cite evidence to support a text inference in different parts of the room. Learners choose, explain with evidence, and reconsider after discussion.

Option 2 · Gallery comparison

Post two worked examples on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Learners visit each, identify the step that works or needs revision, then return to complete a new task independently.

Offer seated response cards or bring the examples to the learner. Movement speed earns no points.

Gamification · 4 minutes

Run it: Use the modeled task and guided-practice question for practice rounds. Reward accurate reasoning and thoughtful revision. Give feedback after each round; everyone attempts the independent task afterward.

Option 1 · Explain and level up

Use three short tasks on Cite evidence to support a text inference. Earn one private point for an accurate answer and one for its reasoning. Revise after feedback, then try a fresh item alone.

Option 2 · Find and fix

Show two plausible solutions on Cite evidence to support a text inference, including one error. Learners find the error, explain why it matters, and repair it. Work toward a shared class goal, then check each learner independently.

Use paper tallies; no public rankings. Record learning evidence separately from game points.
1
Quick diagnostic · 2 min

Teacher: Ask each learner to attempt the key step in Cite evidence to support a text inference and explain the choice. Identify the shared missed step before teaching; do not assume a misconception from the score alone.

Learners: Give one brief response independently and explain your reasoning.

Look for: Confirm the specific gap this group will practice. If their needs differ, adjust the targeted task.

2
Targeted model + guided practice · 8 min

Teacher: Teach the missed step explicitly. Offer two plausible interpretations or claims about the current text. Require students to test both against the text instead of voting by preference. Keep the work anchored to: Cite evidence to support a text inference. Guide one attempt, give immediate feedback, and fade optional prompts while retaining required accommodations.

Learners: Discuss the modeled example with a partner, explain the key step, and compare reasoning before working alone.

Look for: Each learner explains and practices the repaired step; use individual responses during guided practice.

3
Independent progress check · 5 min

Teacher: Give a fresh task on the same target without the worked answer or partner help. Collect each response; preserve required accommodations. Record the support and the next check date.

Learners: Find one piece of evidence for each interpretation, then decide which claim is better supported and defend the choice. Change one condition and justify how that affects the result. Target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Look for: Give a new pair of claims. Each learner writes a short evidence-based judgment independently. Check the selected target: Cite evidence to support a text inference.

Then: If both claims are treated as equally strong without evidence quality, return to evidence ranking; if reasoning is strong, increase text complexity. Scaffold fading: Move from paired evidence search to an individual final judgment.

Evidence sourcesFictional classroom evidence
Why this teaching routine fits

The prerequisite foundation appears close enough to keep instruction centered on the selected target. matches subject and readiness group; matches the selected skill family; matches the instructional purpose; matches prerequisite depth; adds useful contrast to the current instructional mode. Evidence tier C: MasteryCue-designed low-prep routine built from accepted instructional principles. The exact activity has not been independently validated.

VERIFY

Need Evidence · Quick Check

1learner
TEACH THIS

Collect an independent response before assigning a readiness group.

COLLECT NEXTGet enough evidence to place this learner confidently.
Quick check

Choose a short Cite evidence to support a text inference item from today's unit. Read the exact item aloud once and ask, ‘What is your answer? Mark the line, step, or feature that proves it.’ Give no hints or worked example.